In September 2017, Ecofys published a practical "How-to Guide to Internal Carbon Pricing" which can help companies through the end-to-end process.
When it comes to determining your own internal or shadow price, Prices currently vary significantly by region and sector. Analysis by the UK government’s Department of Energy and Climate Change and the Carbon Trust estimates that, in a scenario where warming is limited to less than 2 degrees, the global price of carbon is expected to converge at $140 per ton of CO2 by 2030 and $400 by 2050. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates the social cost of carbon to range between $16-152 by 2020 and $26-212 by 2050. Other studies suggest even higher costs.
ASDA (a Walmart affiliate) was one of the first UK retailers to embed a shadow cost for carbon in all its carbon mitigation investment decisions. Although the actual price set is confidential, ASDA says “its flexible, to allow it to change with time as external factors evolve, and thus ensure our appraisal model remains world class.” Other companies, such as Shell, model carbon prices to lower the risk of stranded assets.
Novartis, the global healthcare company based in Switzerland, is using an internal carbon price to help achieve its sustainability goals. By 2020, the company aims to reduce both scope 1 + 2 emissions and non-recyclable operational waste by 30% compared to 2010. The company has endorsed a carbon price of US$100 per tonne of carbon dioxide emitted, in line with the cost of climate change to society as indicated by the World Bank. Building a carbon price into investment decisions is important as it helps identify projects that will most cost-effectively reduce GHG emissions.
What is an internal carbon tax or fee, and how is that different from a shadow price?
Internal taxes or carbon fees go a step further by charging business units for their emissions and using the revenue generated to support investment into clean technologies and/or carbon reduction projects that help the transition to a low-carbon economy.
Microsoft is one of the best known examples of an organisation setting an internal carbon fee to help meet its environmental objectives. Since 2012, Microsoft has been carbon neutral. Using the money raised from its internal carbon fee to reduce emissions by 9.5 million tonnes of CO2, to purchase more than 14 billion kilowatt hours of green power and to help reach more than 7 million people around the world by supporting carbon reduction projects, such as those certified by Gold Standard.
Ben & Jerry’s creates an internal fund to support investments that help achieve the company’s GHG reduction target. It has set a price of US$10 (or €10) for every metric tonne of GHG emissions. According to the latest CDP report, this fee has generated more than US$1 million annually, which is mainly being used to support farmers in the development and implementation of carbon footprint-reducing strategies within its supply chain.
Disney has set a goal to achieve zero net direct GHG emissions through energy avoidance or reduction, renewable energy, and then offsetting what can´t be avoided. To help with this latter element, they have created the ´Climate Solutions Fund´ whereby they charge businesses for the GHG they produced and use the money generated to invest in projects that fit their business objectives, such as the Gold Standard-certified Gansu Anxi wind farm project.
Ultimately, organisations that invest in carbon reduction projects want to ensure that the money they invest goes as far as it can. Gold Standard believes that climate and development must go hand-in-hand. Thus, all Gold Standard-certified climate protection projects adhere to a participatory approach, environmental + social safeguards, transparent governance, and long-term, consistent outcomes to ensure that our projects not only lower emissions, but deliver sustainable development to vulnerable communities all around the world. By supporting these types of projects, organisations can meet multiple Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and climate mitigation objectives with a single investment.
Like any other business opportunity, the transition to a low-carbon economy will create both winners and losers, but by setting an internal price on carbon, companies will be better prepared to address the risks they face, ensuring they choose the right path for long-term, sustainable success. And by going a step further and implementing an internal carbon tax or fee, they can actively accelerate the transition to a zero-carbon, sustainable world.