Certification Process Step-by-Step
The certification process under Gold Standard for the Global Goals is set-up to help you design your project for maximum positive impact. The application of conservative and considered methodologies ensures accurate quantification of impact, a unique approach to stakeholder inclusivity helps support long term project success, and the assurance process uses approved third-party validation and verification bodies (VVBs) to audit the projects and ensure verified impacts - resulting in high quality projects with credible claims that can attract premium prices.
Whilst Gold Standard does not collaborate on specific projects, or conduct eligibility assessments on behalf of Project Developers, we are happy to answer any clarification questions that you may have regarding our requirements or the certification process.
Please contact [email protected] for further support from our dedicated Stakeholder Relations Team, where you will receive a response within 2 business days.
Process Update
From 5 December 2024 Gold Standard is introducing an updated assurance process. To find out more information please visit the announcement page.
The Fundamentals
Project Planning
Project planning is a key stage of any climate and development initiative. Before embarking on the Gold Standard certification process project developers are encouraged to review the relevant methodologies, standard documentation and terms of use to check that the project meets the Gold Standard for the Global Goals principles and requirements and could be eligible for Gold Standard certification.
Before the project starts, Project Developers should:
1. Identify if there is an applicable methodology for the proposed project.
- View the mitigation and removals options for a high-level overview of feasible scopes (both current and upcoming) under Gold Standard for the Global Goals.
- For a more detailed review the methodology tool can be used to find eligible and available methodologies for Gold Standard for the Global Goals. To finalise the methodology selection, developers must conduct an in-depth review of the applicability conditions contained in section 2 of the methodology document. It’s also important to note the current status of each methodology, as Gold Standard is in the process of revising existing methodologies to align with the Paris Agreement (See Paris Agreement Alignment section below).
- For new technologies, measures and/or interventions, where a methodology is not yet available, there is a methodology approval procedure. Initial ideas, both for brand new methodologies or methodology revisions, can be submitted to check eligibility using the concept note template. Submissions should be emailed to [email protected].
2. Once you have found your methodology, the next step is to check that the project conforms to the Principles & Requirements and the relevant Activity Requirements.
3. For projects that plan to issue Gold Standard carbon credits, additional requirements are located in the GHG emission reductions and sequestration product requirements.
Note
projects need to apply the latest version of the methodology and any applicable tools at the time of first submission (preliminary review). For projects planning to transition from others standards please refer to Annex B of the GHG Emission Reductions & Sequestration Product Requirements for more information.
4. Confirm the basic project design and assess against Gold Standard safeguarding principles.
5. Start to prepare a document that summarises the key project information, including initial estimates for the climate and sustainable development impacts.
6. Assess the Gold Standard Fee Schedule
Please note that this fee schedule refers only to those fees charged by Gold Standard. Additional fees apply from third-party Validation and Verification Bodies (VVBs) approved to validate/verify Gold Standard projects. We encourage you to contact these organisations directly for more information on their fees.
7. Hold a Gold Standard Impact Registry account
At this stage, if you do not already have a Gold Standard Impact Registry Account, it is recommended to submit a request to open one as this is a requirement to make a project submission. The account opening process involves Project Developers undergoing a Know your Customer (KYC) assessment and signing the Terms of Use.
Note The information above refers only to the project planning required for the certification process and does not include the financial or technical studies required to determine the feasibility of project implementation.
TOP TIP
- Make sure to open a Registry Account in plenty of time to avoid any delays in submitting the required documentation.
- Speak to an approved Validation & Verification Body (VVB) early in the process to understand their availability, fees and contracting process.
- It may also be helpful to view similar projects and their certification documents on the Gold Standard Impact Registry.
STEP 1 - Stakeholder Consultation & Safeguards
Once project planning has been completed and a summary of the key project information is developed. Projects can start the stakeholder consultation process.
Stakeholder consultations and meaningful engagement with those who may be affected by a project is an essential element for ensuring the success and sustainability of a project. As part of the Gold Standard certification process projects must hold a Stakeholder Consultation Meeting following these requirements. Additional guidelines have been developed to provide support and practical examples to project developers when applying the requirements.
STEP 2 - Preliminary Review
Once the stakeholder consultation process has been completed a project will have the necessary documentation to move onto a Preliminary Review.
The Preliminary Review considers whether a project has the potential to conform to the Gold Standard Requirements and may therefore progress to “listed” status.The Preliminary Review is a high-level eligibility assessment and is not designed to be an in-depth review of the proposed project, that comes later in the process. The Gold Standard may request clarifications if/where required.
Projects must:
Check LIST
- Submit the Preliminary Review Request Form
- Submit a Stakeholder Consultation Report (draft)
- Submit signed GS4GG Cover Letter
- Submit signed Gold Standard Terms & Conditions
- Pay the fee for the Preliminary Review See Fee schedule
PROCESS
Documents are submitted by creating a new project entry and submitting a request for ‘Preliminary Review’ within the Gold Standard Assurance Platform.
A login for the Assurance Platform is automatically set-up and provided when an account is opened on the Gold Standard Impact Registry. For existing projects, you can request access to the Assurance Platform by submitting the Assurance Platform Access Form.
Assurance Platform Manuals have been developed to provide more information on how to use the platform, including how to upload documentation and submit for review.
TOP TIPS
- Ensure all documents are fully completed and submitted in time to pass the ‘completeness check’ to avoid any unnecessary delays.
- Project Developers shall submit their documentation for preliminary review within one year of the ‘Project Start Date’. Please refer to the Principles & Requirements and applicable Activity Requirements to further understand the key submission deadlines. Extensions to this requirement are defined in the applicable Activity Requirements.
Timeline
- Reviews are to be scheduled and managed by Gold Standard. The timeline is 4 weeks. View the Principles and Requirements Section 5 for more detailed information on the Preliminary Review and its timelines.
- Review Response Timelines: Completeness check responses from project developers are due within two weeks. Missing response deadlines will require a new review request to be submitted. This review request will not incur an additional payment.
PRELIMINARY DESIGN APPROVAL
Approval of the Preliminary Review by Gold Standard results in “GOLD STANDARD PROJECT LISTED” status - making the project publicly visible in the Impact Registry, enabling promotion of the project as per the Claims Guidelines and giving the project the green light to proceed to validation.
FINAL PROJECT DESIGN
Project developers are required to pull together all the documentation, assessments, impact estimates and any other additional evidence or information required to submit the project for validation with Gold Standard approved Validation and Verification Body (VVB).
STEP 3 - Validation by an Independent Third-Party
To apply for Gold Standard certification, projects need to demonstrate compliance with Gold Standard for the Global Goals principles and requirements.
Validation that a project meets these principles and requirements is done through an independent assessment conducted by a Gold Standard approved validation and verification body (VVB), appointed by the project developer. This step may consist of a field visit and/or a desk-based review and provides impartial confirmation that the project's design and monitoring system is in line with the GS4GG Requirements and that the project can indeed achieve the expected impact. Validation must be successfully completed within two years of the date of 'listing' the project.
To undertake a third-party validation, projects must:
check List
- Have “Gold Standard Project Listed” status
- Identify, contract and pay an eligible Gold Standard approved VVB to carry out validation - Find an approved VVB
- Submit to the VVB fully completed estimates of the climate and sustainable development impacts for at least 3 SDGs, including SDG13 Climate, via the digital SDG Impact Tool
- Provide the VVB with a fully completed Project Design Document (PDD) or the relevant POA and/or VPA design document if you are doing a Programme of Activities and all relevant supporting documentation for VVB validation, including:
- Ex-ante emission reduction / removal calculation sheet.
- A Safeguarding Principles Assessment to demonstrate that the project does no harm - submitted as part of the digital SDG Impact Tool.
- A fully completed Stakeholder Consultation Report.
- Monitoring Plan, to show how the project's impact can be credibly and conservatively monitored, reported on, and verified throughout the project's lifetime. Exports from the digital SDG Impact Tool can be used, where relevant, to complete the information in the monitoring plan.
Process
Once the VVB has completed the validation, the VVB will upload the final validation report and any other relevant documentation directly into the Assurance Platform. On submission of the documents, the Gold Standard Assurance and Review Management (ARM) Team will conduct a completeness check and notify the VVB and project developer the documents are ready for design review.
Assurance Platform Manuals have been developed to provide more information on how to use the platform, including how to submit documentation for validation.
Timeline
- Validation timelines are to be scheduled with the contracted VVB directly.
STEP 4 - Design Certification Review
The Design Review is a quality check of the documentation after a positive validation is given by the Gold Standard approved VVB. On approval, the project will appear as ‘Certified Design’ in the Gold Standard Impact Registry.
To initiate the design review, projects must:
Check LIST
- Have a positive validation opinion from an approved VVB.
- Ensure the VVB submits the Final Validation Report, alongside the VVB-approved Project Design Document (PDD), SDG Impact Tool, and all relevant supporting documentation to the Gold Standard Assurance Platform.
- Pay the fee for Design Review. View the Gold Standard Fee Schedule for an overview of the fees.
PROCESS
Once the third-party validation has been completed the VVB will upload the validation report and any other relevant documentation onto the Assurance Platform and submit for Design Certification. Gold Standard will conduct a completeness check and then initiate the global consultation - which will run for two weeks in parallel with the design review - and assign an expert to conduct a quality check of the project documents and validation report to ensure the accuracy, consistency and compliance of the project. Review findings are submitted to the GS-VVB and Project Developer through the platform. The GS-VVB will review these findings and, if applicable, make any necessary changes to the certification decision and submit to Gold Standard.
TOP TIPS
- Ensure all documents are fully completed and submitted in time to pass the ‘completeness check’ to avoid any unnecessary delays.
Timeline
- Project design reviews are managed and scheduled by Gold Standard. They last for a minimum of 4 weeks and are concluded when all Corrective Action requests (CARs)/Clarification Requests (CLs) are successfully closed.
- Review Response Timelines: Project developers and VVBs must meet specific deadlines when responding to CARs, CLs, and observations. Completeness check responses are due within two weeks, while responses to design reviews are due within six weeks. Missing these deadlines will require a new review request to be submitted. This review request will not incur an additional payment.
- The date of ‘Design Certification’ is the last day of the 4-week Design Review period, even if the design review is concluded after this.
Key Criteria Checked:
- Safeguards are covered by the project design
- Stakeholder inclusive design
- Robust monitoring plan
- Credible baseline and additionality
- Credible estimation of climate and sustainable development impacts
DESIGN CERTIFICATION
Approval results in “GOLD STANDARD CERTIFIED DESIGN ” status.
This means that documentation, including the PDD, Monitoring + Reporting Plan and final Validation Report are made public. The project can be promoted according to the Claims Guidelines and project becomes eligible to move forward to Performance Certification.
Project Monitoring and Reporting
The Project Developer implements the project and its monitoring system according to the certified project design.
Poject must:
checklist
- Monitor the project's safeguards and impacts according to the certified monitoring plan
- Continuously engage with stakeholders
- Submit Annual Reports to Gold Standard Assurance Platform in years when verification does not occur
- Prepare a Monitoring Report for verification to request issuance of impact statements and/or products and submit to Gold Standard Assurance Platform.
STEP 5 - Verification by an Independent Third-Party
Verification of the project activity involves an independent assessment conducted by an accredited and Gold Standard Approved Validation and Verification Body (VVB), appointed by the project developer. This consists of a site visit and/or desk-based review and provides independent confirmation that the project and its impacts are in line with the Gold Standard Requirements and relevant methodology(ies).
To initiate the verification, projects must
CHECKLIST
- Have “Gold Standard Certified Design” status
- Identify, contract, and pay an eligible VVB to carry out verification.
- Provide to the VVB a fully completed Monitoring Report (MR) and all relevant supporting documentation for VVB verification via the Gold Standard Assurance Platform including
- Ex-Post Emission Reduction / Removal Calculation Sheet
- Digital SDG Impact Tool Submission
- Primary data for VVB assessment
process
Once the VVB has completed the verification, the VVB will upload the final verification report and any other relevant documentation directly into the Assurance Platform. On submission of the documents, the Gold Standard Assurance and Review Management (ARM) Team will conduct a completeness check and notify the VVB the documents are ready for performance review.
Assurance Platform Manuals have been developed to provide more information on how to use the platform, including how to submit documentation for verification.
Timeline
- Verification timelines are to be scheduled with the contracted VVB directly. Verification ends when the VVB submits a positive verification report to the Assurance Platform.
- Verification must occur at least once during the five-year certification cycle with the first verification completed within two years of the project implementation date or design certification date, whichever is later.
STEP 6 - Performance Review
The Performance Review is a quality check of the documentation after a positive verification is given by the Gold Standard approved VVB. On approval, the project will appear as a ‘Certified Project’ in the Gold Standard Impact Registry.
Once the third-party verification is completed, the VVB will upload the final verification report and any other relevant documentation onto the Assurance Platform. Gold Standard will conduct a completeness check and then initiate the global consultation - which will run for two weeks in parallel with the performance review - and assign an expert to conduct a quality check of the project documents and verification report to ensure the accuracy, consistency and compliance of the project. Review findings are submitted to the GS-VVB and the project developer through the platform. The GS-VVB will review these findings and, if applicable, make any necessary changes to the certification decision and submit directly to Gold Standard. Gold Standard will issue the certification outcomes, including carbon credits where relevant, into the Gold Standard Impact Registry based on the decision provided by the GS-VVB.
To initiate the performance review, projects must
checklist
- Have a positive verification opinion from a VVB
- Ensure VVB submits the Final Verification Report, VVB approved Monitoring Report and all relevant supporting documentation to the Gold Standard Assurance Platform.
- Pay the fee for performance review. See full Gold Standard Fee Schedule for more details.
top tip
- Ensure all documents are fully completed and submitted in time to pass the ‘completeness check’ to avoid any unnecessary delays.
Timeline
- Project performance reviews are managed and scheduled by Gold Standard. They last for a minimum of 3 weeks from date of review, unless otherwise stated in the methodology or Activity Requirements, and are concluded when all Corrective Action requests (CARs)/Clarification Requests (CLs) are successfully closed.
- Review Response Timelines: Project developers and VVBs must meet specific deadlines when responding to CARs, CLs, and observations. Completeness check responses are due within two weeks, while responses to performance reviews are due within six weeks. Missing these deadlines will result in request rejection, requiring a new review request to be submitted. This review request will not incur an additional payment.
Key Criteria Checked:
- Adherence to safeguards
- Adherence to stakeholder inclusivity
- Climate and sustainable development impact achieved
PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATION
Approval results in “CERTIFIED GOLD STANDARD PROJECT” status.
Once a project has received ‘Certified’ project status the project will be invoiced the fee for issuance of the relevant products (including carbon credits). These products will be issued to the project’s registry account on receipt of payment of the issuance fee. There is no provision to delay issuance following conclusion of the Performance Certification review.
FEES
View the Gold Standard Fee schedule for information on issuance fees.
CLAIMS
Claims guidelines assist project developers, fund managers, partners, supporters, purchasers and claimants of certificates/credits and investors in communicating accurately and appropriately about the certification status of projects and funds as well as climate and development impacts derived from Gold Standard-certified projects, programmes and funds.
STEP 7 - Design Certification Renewal (Validation)
To maintain Gold Standard Certified Project status beyond five years, a project must undergo Design Certification Renewal. To renew a project’s certified design, it needs to apply the newest versions of the methodologies, tools and standard documents, demonstrate ongoing finance need, redefine the baseline scenario, and update its monitoring system accordingly. These updates are then validated by a third-party approved Validation and Verification Body.
At renewal, project developers shall also consider the changes required for Paris Agreement Alignment (see page 22). Projects are obliged to transition to the latest Paris-Aligned methodology when applying for the next 5-year period.
These updates are then validated by a third-party approved Validation and Verification Body.
Projects must
checklist
- Have “Gold Standard Design Certified” status
- Update the project design and monitoring plan, applying the newest version of relevant methodologies, tools and standard requirements
- Identify, contract and pay a Gold Standard approved Verification and Validation Body to carry out validation
- Re-submit to the VVB an updated SDG Impact Tool, Project Design Document (PDD) and all relevant supporting documentation for VVB re-validation
process
Once the VVB has completed the re-validation, the VVB will upload the final validation report and any other relevant documentation directly into the assurance platform. On submission of the documents, the Gold Standard ARM Team will conduct a completeness check and notify the VVB the documents are ready for review.
Timeline
- Validation timelines are to be scheduled with the contracted VVB directly.
- A renewal opinion shall be submitted by a VVB no later than the last date of the current certification cycle. A delay in completion of revalidation shall result in a reduction of issued products/impact statements.
STEP 8 - Design Certification Renewal (Review)
Once the third-party validation for design certification renewal the VVB will upload the final documents to the Assurance Platform. Gold Standard will conduct a completeness check and then initiate the global consultation - which will run for two weeks in parallel with the design certification renewal - and assign an expert to conduct a quality check of the project documents to ensure the accuracy, consistency and compliance of the project. Review findings are submitted to the GS-VVB through the platform. The GS-VVB will review these findings and, if applicable, make any necessary changes to the certification decision and submit directly to Gold Standard.
To initiate the review for design certification renewal, projects must
Checklist
- Have a positive validation opinion from VVB
- Ensure VVBs submit the Final Validation Report, a VVB-approved updated Project Design Document (PDD), updated SDG Impact Tool, and all relevant supporting documentation to the Gold Standard Assurance Platform.
- Pay the Design Certification Renewal Review Fee. See full Gold Standard fee schedule for more details.
timeline
- Review Response Timelines: Project developers and VVBs must meet specific deadlines when responding to CARs, CLs, and observations. Completeness check responses are due within two weeks, while responses to crediting period renewal (design certification renewal) review are due within six weeks. Missing these deadlines will result in request rejection, requiring a new review request to be submitted. This review request will not incur an additional payment.
Other Important Information
about the Certification Process
PARIS AGREEMENT ALIGNMENT
Gold Standard has recently updated requirements to align fully with the Paris Agreement.
At a high level, this means strengthening how emission reductions and removals are calculated, ensuring carbon finance goes beyond business-as-usual, and reflecting national climate policies and targets in project baselines. It also requires more rigorous demonstration of additionality, improved treatment of leakage, and higher data-quality expectations. Gold Standard methodologies are being revised through the first half of 2026, and all carbon credits issued with vintages from 1 January 2026 onward must use these Paris-aligned rules.
This matters for new project developers because:
- Paris-aligned projects will maximise market viability across voluntary and compliance markets. Gold Standard is the first standard to make this change, helping new developers to unlock demand, access regulatory support and ensure long-term stability.
- Paris aligned versions of an applicable methodology may not be immediately available, yet will be available shortly. We encourage project developers to check the as each methodology Alignment Schedule for more information.
- Developers should plan ahead for Paris-aligned methodologies when drafting project plans and estimating emission reductions.
- Documentation and data systems need to meet higher quality and transparency standards.
- Understanding alignment timelines helps avoid delays when seeking validation or issuance for 2026+ vintages.
Full details of the rational, requirements, and supporting guidance can be found on our Paris Agreement Alignment Page.
TRANSITION PROJECTS
Eligible projects can transition from other standards to Gold Standard for the Global Goals. More information, including the eligibility criteria, requirements and procedures, are included in ANNEX B of the GHG Emission Reduction and Sequestration Product Requirements and guidance is available in Transition Procedure for Transitioning Projects from Other Standards to Gold Standard for the Global Goals. You can find the relevant documents and templates in the Project Transition Page.
DESIGN CHANGE
Once a project design is certified, it must be implemented as described in the Project Design Document. Any significant, permanent changes or corrections, including of project size, installed capacity, methodology used (including transition to PA aligned methodologies),, crediting period start date, etc. must be submitted for review and re-certification in the form of a formal request for a design change.
The procedure for a design change doesn’t apply to temporary deviations. There is a deviation process to support these short-term amendments.
To submit a request for a design change project developers need to follow the requirements outlines in Annex A of the Principles and Requirements.
The template for submitting a design change is located in the Design Document templates (i.e. PDD | PoA DD | VPA DD). Design changes are submitted to the certification body. Upon receipt of the formal request for a design change and once payment of the design change fee has been received a review is conducted.
To initiate a design change, projects must
- Complete Annex 4 of the relevant Project Design Document, including justification of the impact of the design change on the project’s additionality, eligibility, safeguards, and estimated impact.
- Conduct a stakeholder consultation, if necessary
- Update the Project Design Document
- Identify, contract and pay VVB to carry out validation - Find an approved VVB>>
- Pay the Design Change Review Fee. See full Gold Standard fee schedule for more details.
For the review the following documentation must be submitted to the Gold Standard Assurance Platform by submitting a Request for a Design Change:
- A VVB-approved Design Change Request Form
- An updated Project Design Document (PDD)
- Updated SDG Tool
- All relevant supporting documentation
- A final Validation Report
Timeline
Review Response Timelines: Project developers and VVBs must meet specific deadlines when responding to CARs, CLs, and observations. Completeness check responses are due within two weeks, while responses to design change reviews are due within six weeks. Missing these deadlines will result in request rejection, requiring a new design change review request to be submitted. This review request will not incur an additional payment.
DEVIATIONS
If a project is temporarily unable to comply with the certified monitoring plan, or with specific deadlines, it may apply for an exception for a given process or monitoring period. Such deviations are granted on a project-by-project basis on the discretion of the Gold Standard Technical Advisory Committee or based on precedents already reviewed and published.
The procedure for submitting a deviation request is outlined in the Deviation Approval Requirements and Procedures. The deviation request form and the full list of published deviations can be viewed online.
Project developers seeking permanent changes to a registered project activity need to follow the Design Change Approval Process.
To initiate a deviation request, projects must
- Fill out a Deviation Request form, including justification of the need for the deviation and a proposed alternative ensuring conservative outcomes
- If necessary identify, contract and pay an eligible Gold Standard approved VVB to provide an opinion
Submit the Deviation Request Form and all relevant supporting documentation to [email protected]. The request will be initially reviewed to check for precedents – if none exist it will be passed to Gold Standard Secretariat for review and elevated to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), if required.
CLARIFICATION REQUESTS
To seek clarifications or an interpretation of the Gold Standard for the Global Goals requirements, fill-in the Clarification Request Form and submit to [email protected]. The submission will be reviewed by the team and a resolution will be provided within 10 working days. Please note that Gold Standard cannot give advice on project eligibility or how to best structure a project to meet requirements.
This process has been developed to formalise and expedite the process for answering queries and questions received daily. In time, resolved clarification requests deemed useful to other stakeholders will be made publicly available on the Gold Standard for the Global Goals website.